- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@miscoranda.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:53:00 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > “[...] Although the URI MAY point to a resource that contains a > definition of the semantics of the relation type, clients SHOULD > NOT access that resource to avoid overburdening its server." Does that mean that RDF users would routinely be able to check whether a 303 is returned, or does it not? If the former, then the SHOULD NOT injunction doesn't serve its purpose. If not, then there is a compatibility problem with RDF. Kindest regards, -- Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/
Received on Friday, 17 April 2009 15:53:40 UTC