- From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:11:18 -0700
- To: "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: <www-archive@w3.org>
Hi Dan, "tdb" and "duri" were written up as a 'thought experiment', and I didn't pursue them because, well, no point in clogging up the standards process with specifications that no one actually has a use for. I think if they were to be pursued they would belong as top-level schemes, and not in the 'urn' space or under 'tag', at least in my own model of how those things work out. Anyway, I suggest a kind of 'vote with your feet' approach: if you're willing to push the document through the process, I'll let you submit it as a joint author. I *have* been working on some related work with regard to embedded identifiers in media assets (within XMP) which I think will be published soon -- I'll send you a pointer when it is. Larry -----Original Message----- From: Dan Brickley [mailto:danbri@danbri.org] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 5:01 AM To: LMM@acm.org Cc: www-archive@w3.org Subject: Plans for http://larry.masinter.net/duri.html ? Hi there There's been a bit of discussion this week on the TAG and RDFa lists about "the thing described by" and related techniques for indirect identification. So I thought I'd drop you note to find out if you have any plans to continue work on the "duri" and "tdb" namespaces, whether as URN registrations, standalone URI schemes, or a subspace eg. of tag: URIs. My own interest comes from some similar tricks used in the FOAF RDF vocabulary, where I have a property "isPrimaryTopicOf" (and an inverse, primaryTopic) used for indirectly identifying things via eg. wikipedia pages. We don't directly have the temporal aspect though (due to the way RDF works). FOAF also uses a similar trick for other kinds of identifying property, such as email, openid, hashed email etc. - http://rdfweb.org/mt/foaflog/archives/2003/07/10/12.05.33/ The recent interest around tdb: comes from discussion of RDFa, a syntax for embedding RDF inside XHTML and HTML, to make more of the page's prose content machine readable. Naturally this often touches on the identification and description of the "thing described by" that page, ... hence this mail. Thanks for any thoughts, cheers, Dan -- http://danbri.org/
Received on Monday, 6 October 2008 21:11:56 UTC