Re: An HTML language specification

On Nov 25, 2008, at 21:12, Mark Baker wrote:

> Defining the language in terms of an abstraction which isn't  
> relevant to all uses of HTML is IMO,
> prima facie a bad idea.

Would you accept an abstraction of "document tree"?

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/

Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2008 15:11:38 UTC