- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:17:00 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Julian, On Mar 17, 2008, at 2:33 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> I think we all assumed good faith on Julian's part until it became >> clear he was trying to game the system to prove a point. I'm glad >> he finally > > I was not. > > Just because I added an ironic remark about the process doesn't mean > that I did not raise the technical issue with good reasons. My impression was that you made your proposal not because you actually wanted it accepted, but because you suspected it would be opposed, in order to demonstrate a point about other features of HTML5 (such as content sniffing) that touch on HTTP, i.e. that similar arguments apply and they should also be rejected. I was not the only one to get that impression. Since it sounded like that was your intent, I really didn't want to discuss the feature on the merits any further. If that was not your intent then I apologize; but that certainly wasn't clear from your emails. Now, from the combination of your statements, I'm still unsure what you intend: 1) Do you sincerely think HTML5 should require particular handling of the Content-Disposition header, despite in all other cases arguing strenuously against specs "profiling the underlying protocol"? If so, then that deserves to be discussed on the merits, and I apologize for cutting you off. (I happen to think that on balance it's not worth adding to HTML5, but that should be discussed on the list.) 2) Did you raise this proposal to show that the arguments against it also argue for removing other features that are already in HTML5? In that case, please make your point about those features directly instead. I assumed these were mutually exclusive options, but I suppose you could have both aims. If so, then mixing them up makes things even more confusing to readers, since they cannot even tell if your proposal is made in good faith. Regards, Maciej
Received on Monday, 17 March 2008 22:17:39 UTC