W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > June 2008

Re: A brief description of issue tracker states

From: Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:26:04 +0900
To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Cc: smedero@ldc.upenn.edu, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20080620122600.GF17752@sideshowbarker>
Hi Steven,

> @2008-06-20 10:52 +0100:
> hi shawn, thanks for putting issue tracker states info [1] up on the wiki.

And thanks to you and Shawn both for taking initiative on this. It
is much appreciated.

> Suggest changing to
> "PENDINGREVIEW = Working Group Chairs will review all
> contributions and determine if Working Group consensus has been
> reached. After due consideration of different opinions, consensus is
> not achieved, the Chairs may put a question to the Working Group"

Agreed that there's no good reason the description needs to be
restricted to only mention decisions by the editor, agreed that
the above looks like reasonable alternative wording to me.

> suggest changing to:
> "CLOSED = Chairs, Editors and Working Group believes this issue to be

Looks OK

> If nobody has objections I will edit the changes.

I personally have no objections, but please do wait until Monday
so that everybody has had time to respond (Shawn in particular,
since it's making a change to something he took the time to write
up initially).

Again, thanks to both Shawn and you for driving this.


Michael(tm) Smith

Received on Friday, 20 June 2008 12:26:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:33:31 UTC