Hi Steven, > @2008-06-20 10:52 +0100: > hi shawn, thanks for putting issue tracker states info [1] up on the wiki. And thanks to you and Shawn both for taking initiative on this. It is much appreciated. > Suggest changing to > > "PENDINGREVIEW = Working Group Chairs will review all > contributions and determine if Working Group consensus has been > reached. After due consideration of different opinions, consensus is > not achieved, the Chairs may put a question to the Working Group" Agreed that there's no good reason the description needs to be restricted to only mention decisions by the editor, agreed that the above looks like reasonable alternative wording to me. > suggest changing to: > > "CLOSED = Chairs, Editors and Working Group believes this issue to be > RESOLVED. " Looks OK > If nobody has objections I will edit the changes. I personally have no objections, but please do wait until Monday so that everybody has had time to respond (Shawn in particular, since it's making a change to something he took the time to write up initially). Again, thanks to both Shawn and you for driving this. --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/ http://sideshowbarker.net/
Received on Friday, 20 June 2008 12:26:45 UTC