- From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:49:49 +0100
- To: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>
- Cc: connolly@w3.org, chris.wilson@microsoft.com, mike@w3.org, alfred.s.gilman@ieee.org, brewer@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, www-archive@w3.org, wai-liaison@w3.org
Hi Gregory, > 1. what caused the chairs to remove 10 participants in "good standing"? the answer appears in the IRC logs [18:56] <DanC> MikeSmith, do you know why there are just 5 people in http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/ there were a dozen or so as of http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-issue-tracking/2008Apr/0000.html [18:56] <MikeSmith> because of issues 42-50 source: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20080613#l-359 2008/6/16 Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>: > > aloha! > > i recently visited: > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/users > > and discovered, to my surprise, that the number of persons listed as > issue tracker participants have been reduced to six: > > * Dan Connolly > * James Graham > * Shawn Medero > * Julian Reschke > * Michael(tm) Smith > * Chris Wilson > > last week, the list included: > > * Dan Connolly > * Michael Cooper > * Karl Dubost > * James Graham > * Ian Hickson > * Lachlan Hunt > * David Hyatt > * Charles McCathieNevile > * Shawn Medero > * Julian Reschke > * Gregory Rosmaita > * David Singer > * Michael(tm) Smith > * Maciej Stachowiak > * Anne van Kesteren > * Chris Wilson > > * 16 group participants, > * 16 in good standing, > * 12 participants from 5 organizations > * 4 Invited Experts > > [retrieved 1:44 PM EDST (US) from > http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=41863] > > which leads to the following questions: > > 1. what caused the chairs to remove 10 participants in "good standing"? > > 2. why were those who were eliminated from the issue tracking group NOT > informed? > > 3. what is the criterion for retention on the issue tracker group? > > 4. how does one get "reinstated" to the issue tracker group > > please address these questions in as timely a manner as possible -- are > the chairs curtailing participation in the issue tracker group, and if > so, why were some members dropped whilst others were retained? > > i originally asked the chairs for a clarification of issue tracking > states (raised, open, closed) and policies, but did not expect the > outcome to be the draconian reduction of the issue tracking group > without an explanation on the part of the chairs to those who were > eliminated from the issue tracking group... > > is there a documented resolution to reduce the issue tracking group? > if so, what were the criteria that led to the elimination of many and > the retention of a few? > > gregory. > -------------------------------------------------------- > Men are not against you; they are merely for themselves. > -- Gene Fowler (1890-1960) > -------------------------------------------------------- > Gregory J. Rosmaita: oedipus@hicom.net > Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/index.html > -------------------------------------------------------- > > > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Monday, 16 June 2008 09:50:38 UTC