- From: Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:01:41 +0900
- To: Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Message-ID: <20080614230139.GA15521@sideshowbarker>
Rob, I note that at this point Hixie has made the following technical assessment of your proposal: These really aren't areas where we have any flexibility to be honest. Parsing is an incredibly complex area and the constraints within which we have to work are very, very tight. The current parsing model was based on extensive research over billions of documents and multiple independent implementations and I don't see any way that we could change what you are asking for. Are you disagreeing with that on grounds that Hixie is technically incorrect? If so, given that Hixie is actually the author the parsing algorithm, if you disagree with that technical assessment, I think it is necessary for you show that it's wrong, not for Hixie to show it's correct -- specifically, you need to demonstrate how we could change what you are asking for without breaking the parsing model. --Mike bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org, 2008-06-14 18:58 +0000: > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5752 > > Rob Burns <rob@robburns.com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED > Resolution|WONTFIX | > > --- Comment #7 from Rob Burns <rob@robburns.com> 2008-06-14 18:58:06 --- > I disagree. I'm brining it up here per the request of the chairs -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/ http://sideshowbarker.net/
Received on Saturday, 14 June 2008 23:02:20 UTC