- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:54:21 +0200
- To: "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, "Steven Faulkner" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Chris Wilson" <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "James Graham" <jg307@cam.ac.uk>, www-archive@w3.org, "Robert Burns" <rob@robburns.com>, wai-liaison@w3.org
On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 12:34:11 +0200, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: > The question that needs a clear and unambiguous answer is, what is the > step-by-step procedure for a working group member to get a proposal > into the spec? So far it seems that if there's agreement between implementors and authors that a certain problem needs solving that is considered to be in scope something to solve the problem will be added to the specification. Which is then incrementally evolved by author and implementor feedback over the next few years. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Saturday, 7 June 2008 10:55:04 UTC