- From: WBS Mailer on behalf of oedipus@hicom.net <webmaster@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:40:01 +0000
- To: oedipus@hicom.net,www-archive@w3.org
The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Web Forms Features' (HTML Working Group) for . --------------------------------- Should the design in "2. Extensions to form control elements" be included in HTML 5? ---- Section 2 has extensions to the input/@type attribute such as dates, as well as a @pattern attribute etc. Should it be included in HTML 5? If you prefer that specific parts of this design be changed, please note that in a comment (perhaps by reference to email archives, bugzilla entries, etc.) Note that the design in section 2 depends on material from various other sections, e.g. "4. The forms event model", "7. Extensions to the HTML Level 2 DOM interfaces". Integrating the extensions to form control elements into the HTML 5 specification will naturally include material from these other sections. * ( ) Yes * (x) No * ( ) Concur (cast vote with the majority) * ( ) Blank vote Rationale: i object to the assumption that WF2 is the solution for next generation web forms; true "architectural alignment" between WF2 and XForms is only possible if the Forms WG and the HTML WG can cooperate as two working groups producing a SINGLE construct: next-generation web forms which the community can readily adapt, use, and deploy, through a common client-side processing model. Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): http://esw.w3.org/topic/GregoryRosmaita/FormsFeedback2008-07 --------------------------------- Should the design in "3. The repetition model for repeating form controls" be included in HTML 5? ---- Section 3 has a design for repeated sections. If you prefer that specific parts of this design be changed, please note that in a comment (perhaps by reference to email archives, bugzilla entries, etc.) * ( ) Yes * (x) No * ( ) Concur (cast vote with the majority) * ( ) Blank vote Rationale: my vote reflects my disappointment at having WF2 treated as a fait accompli; IF WF2 is to be adopted by HTML5, will it be rolled into a single document, or will WF2 constitute a "forms" module for HTML5 and its XML-serialization? if the latter, then it is essential that the work on XForms 1.2 Transitional be considered along with the WF2 submission Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): http://esw.w3.org/topic/GregoryRosmaita/FormsFeedback2008-07 --------------------------------- Should the design in "6. Fetching data from external resources" be included in HTML 5? ---- Section 6 has a mechanism for fetch from an external file to fill forms. Should it be included in HTML 5? If you prefer that specific parts of this design be changed, please note that in a comment (perhaps by reference to email archives, bugzilla entries, etc.) * ( ) Yes * (x) No * ( ) Concur (cast vote with the majority) * ( ) Blank vote Rationale: any such mechanism should be part of a forms module for HTML5 which should be interoperable with other markup languages in order to provide a consistent author and user experience Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): http://esw.w3.org/topic/GregoryRosmaita/FormsFeedback2008-07 --------------------------------- Should the design in "5.4. application/x-www-form+xml: XML submission" be included in HTML 5? ---- Section 5.4 has a XML submission mechanism. Should it be included in HTML 5? If you prefer that specific parts of this design be changed, please note that in a comment (perhaps by reference to email archives, bugzilla entries, etc.) * ( ) Yes * (x) No * ( ) Concur (cast vote with the majority) * ( ) Blank vote Rationale: only if aligned with XForms 1.2 Transitional Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): http://esw.w3.org/topic/GregoryRosmaita/FormsFeedback2008-07 These answers were last modified on 11 July 2008 at 02:34:34 U.T.C. by Gregory Rosmaita Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wfreq/ until 2008-07-10. Regards, The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Friday, 11 July 2008 02:40:36 UTC