- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 06:41:35 -0600
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: "Steven Faulkner" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, "Chris Wilson" <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "Al Gilman" <Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org>, "Michael Cooper" <cooper@w3.org>
Hi Dan, On 8 Feb 2008, Steven Faulkner wrote: > As the PFWG have provided a response to the question of whether alt should > be required or optional in HTML5, what is the process for dealing with it > within the HTML working group? On 8 Feb 2008, Dan Connolly wrote: > I'm not sure; if you give me a pointer to the PFWG response, that > will help me figure it out. On 8 Feb 2008, Steven Faulkner wrote: > thanks Dan > the response was posted to the HTML WG list on the 6th of feb [snip] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Feb/0082.html > > j graham added it to the issue tracker, though from the wording in the > description isn't clear that it is about the PFWG response. It would be good > to be able to clarify and add relevant info into the tracker on the issue. > > on that topic, who can add issues to the tracker and what are the criteria > for addition? Just wanted to follow up on Steve's inquiry. - Has any progress been made on figuring out what process will be used? - How is an issue moved forward. How is an open issue turned into an action item? - How and by whom is it determined when issue resolved? - Is there a way to clarify that issue 31 is about the PFWG response? - Who can add issues to the tracker and what are the criteria for addition? Thanks you. Best Regards, Laura
Received on Friday, 15 February 2008 12:45:18 UTC