- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:52:18 -0600
- To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, public html for all <list@html4all.org>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Steven Faulkner wrote: > Hi Dan, > > As the PFWG have provided a response to the question of whether alt > should be required or optional in HTML5, what is the process for dealing > with it within the HTML working group? I'm not sure; if you give me a pointer to the PFWG response, that will help me figure it out. This sounds like a design issue; our process around those is not very mature, though you might make sure it's in the list: Product HTML 5 spec Open and Raised Issues http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/products/1 Our priority is on requirements issues so far: Product HTML Principles/Requirements Open and Raised Issues http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/products/2 We actually made a WG decision on one of the requirements issues: ISSUE-15 immediate-mode-graphics requirement for Immediate Mode Graphics and canvas element http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/15 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 8 February 2008 17:52:21 UTC