- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:54:14 +0200
- To: Kristof Zelechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- CC: 'WHAT-WG' <whatwg@whatwg.org>, 'Ian Hickson' <ian@hixie.ch>, 'Manu Sporny' <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, www-archive@w3.org
Kristof Zelechovski wrote: > This amounts to saying that URLs take precedence over CURIEs and CURIEs can > be enclosed in brackets in case of any ambiguity. This sounds ridiculous > given the weight you put on avoiding ambiguities and name clashes. Since It would. My recommendation is to require the non-ambiguous notation everywhere where URIs can appear. > the author does not control the URL scheme registration process, he can > never be sure that a particular prefix is "safe", therefore using unsafe > CURIEs is just asking for trouble. However, Manu's examples DO NOT use safe Right. > CURIEs, nor do any examples I have seen on this discussion. Good heavens!~ > Chris I do agree this is a problem, and I think there was a TAG comment with respect to this during Last Call. BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2008 15:54:57 UTC