Kristof Zelechovski wrote: > This amounts to saying that URLs take precedence over CURIEs and CURIEs can > be enclosed in brackets in case of any ambiguity. This sounds ridiculous > given the weight you put on avoiding ambiguities and name clashes. Since It would. My recommendation is to require the non-ambiguous notation everywhere where URIs can appear. > the author does not control the URL scheme registration process, he can > never be sure that a particular prefix is "safe", therefore using unsafe > CURIEs is just asking for trouble. However, Manu's examples DO NOT use safe Right. > CURIEs, nor do any examples I have seen on this discussion. Good heavens!~ > Chris I do agree this is a problem, and I think there was a TAG comment with respect to this during Last Call. BR, JulianReceived on Wednesday, 27 August 2008 15:54:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:33:32 UTC