- From: Křištof Želechovski <giecrilj@stegny.2a.pl>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:34:55 +0200
- To: "'Manu Sporny'" <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "'WHAT-WG'" <whatwg@whatwg.org>, <www-archive@w3.org>
Actually the chances of name conflict rise square-exponentially, like 1 − exp(−C*N²) Chris -----Original Message----- From: whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org [mailto:whatwg-bounces@lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Manu Sporny Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 4:50 AM To: Ian Hickson Cc: WHAT-WG; www-archive@w3.org Subject: Re: [whatwg] RDFa Features (was: RDFa Problem Statement) When you use non-prefixed vocabulary terms, the chances that there will be a vocabulary term conflict between two communities rises exponentially with relation to an increase in the number of total vocabularies. This approach is not scalable and was never meant to be scalable.
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2008 14:58:27 UTC