- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:22:51 +0200
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "Bonner, Matt" <matt.bonner@hp.com>, "'Tab Atkins Jr.'" <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-archive@w3.org" <www-archive@w3.org>, "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Ben Adida wrote: > ... > I would love to see reactions from the HTML5 group that are a little > more productive than "you don't really need what you think you need." > ... I agree that HTML5 should include a mechanism to embed RDF, be it by a generic extension mechanism, or by adding specific vocabulary (such as RDFa). Note that the WG is indeed chartered to consider that topic: "The HTML WG is encouraged to provide a mechanism to permit independently developed vocabularies such as Internationalization Tag Set (ITS), Ruby, and RDFa to be mixed into HTML documents. Whether this occurs through the extensibility mechanism of XML, whether it is also allowed in the classic HTML serialization, and whether it uses the DTD and Schema modularization techniques, is for the HTML WG to determine." -- <http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html> Best regards, Julian (HTML5 WG member)
Received on Sunday, 24 August 2008 16:23:47 UTC