- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 08:15:35 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 15:05 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: > Dan Connolly wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 14:57 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: > >> Dan Connolly wrote: > >>> Any news on this? > >> Nope. > >> > >> Apparently it didn't make it onto Ian's todo list... > > > > I don't recall Ian being in the critical path. > > > > I thought you gathered some test results during your > > investigation; I just want you to share what you > > learned. > > > > Did I get confused? > > Partly. > > I volunteered to run once the known problems with the tests (bad content > encoding, maybe more) have been fixed ah. I see. > -- running tests that are known to > be broken didn't seem to be a good use of my time to me. > > That being said, I can have another look and see what the current state > is; and then potentially ping again Ian. > > BR, Julian -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2008 13:15:45 UTC