- From: Steve Faulkner <sfaulkner@paciellogroup.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:30:16 +0100
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, www-archive@w3.org
- Message-ID: <55687cf80709110530o7f6d16faobfd02aa28a691dfe@mail.gmail.com>
hi Anne and Maciej, OK so at least this exchange between us has proved worthwhile in that a non adversarial dialogue has started, lets use this opportunity to keep keep the lines of communication open in the future. I would appreciate your thoughts on a question i posed on the public HTML WG list (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Sep/0150.html) when you have the time. On 11/09/2007, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:02:18 +0200, Steve Faulkner > <sfaulkner@paciellogroup.com> wrote: > >> The alt= attribute is a known open issue. > > > > It would be good if it has that status, that it be recorded as such in > > the spec. To date I have seen nothing from the editors of the spec to > > indicate this (either in the spec, on the html wg list or on IRC). > > I agree this would be nice. As has been stated before on public-html > volunteers are needed to make it easy to mark up open issues in the > specification. I believe Simon Pieters has done some work there recently, > but I'm not sure where it ended up. > > > > I do think that making such contraversial changes to the spec without > > debate and research does create an atmosphere in which adversarial > > exchanges > > flourish. > > It's a draft. Until recently the draft didn't say much about <img> at all. > Now it contains an idea from the editor on how alt= can be handled > including lots of detailed examples on how to write good alt text. This > seems like a good thing. Apparently one of the changes has a negative > impact on (some) assistive technology. This has been pointed out on the > HTML WG mailing list and several weblogs. I'd assume that whenever the > editor is going to look at feedback for the alt= attribute again he'll > take all that into account. This is how the editing process is functioning > and it works pretty well as progress is made quite fast. > > (FWIW, there are a lot of ideas in the draft there's no real agreement > about yet. I'd assume lots of the things in there are controversial for > Microsoft for instance. These are all issues that will be dealt with in > one way or another in an open way and nobody will be ignored. (As you > might recall, it were mostly the WHATWG contributers actively pushing > people (through their weblogs) to join the HTML WG so they can give > feedback.)) > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > <http://annevankesteren.nl/> > <http://www.opera.com/> > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2007 12:30:23 UTC