- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:13:55 -0600
- To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Cc: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 12:02 -0500, Michael Cooper wrote: > I guess the question is whether the action is to initiate the > discussion, or to bring it to resolution. The latter, please. I added a note: 2007-11-29 17:06:06: Michael C, pls update due date with a realistic timeframe for completing the discussion. [Dan Connolly] > I brought it to PFWG. There was some opposition to the idea, but I > wouldn't say it's been fully ruled out, just not ruled in. There are > additional discussion planned. So in terms of arriving at a > resolution, I can't predict that, and if that's what you want to > track, we should set the due date far in the future. I changed the due date to 5 December; if you haven't changed the due date by then, you can expect another ping... > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/8 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2007 22:14:07 UTC