- From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:11:07 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: > On the other hand, lots of people (yourself included) could > have changed it and, as far as I know, have not. There would need to be some motivation, and that would vary as the importance one ascribes to world-writable media such as Wikipaedia. For myself, I am willing to consult it, but would never dream of citing it as an authority; on that basis, I see little point in leaping in and changing ?Lacky?s words to indicate that the assertion is contested, since there are probably several hundred thousand equally disputable assertions in the 'paedia if one could be bothered to search them out ... ** Phil.
Received on Friday, 2 November 2007 17:11:38 UTC