- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 12:09:29 -0600
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, www-archive@w3.org
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > On May 7, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Dan Connolly wrote: [...] >> I _only_ >> have use for >> * I support the proposal; I'm willing to help get it deployed >> >> * I object to the proposal to the extent that I want to put >> the whole project at risk >> >> I'm happy to lump all the rest (abstain/no answer/disagree/whatever) >> together, for formal decision-making purposes. > > It seems that these are the most extreme positions possible on any > issue. And trying to push people towards the most extreme positions is > likely to polarize the group more, rather than leading to compromise. That point is well made. It gives me pause. I'm thinking it over. [...] > I'd like to hear what our other chair thinks about this idiosyncratic > interpretation of the W3C decision process. Yes, here's hoping you find time to think about this and respond, Chris. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2007 18:09:28 UTC