Re: Last call comments on XML Binding Language (XBL) 2.0

On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:06:52 +0100, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>  
wrote:
> / "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com> was heard to say:
> | On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:18:10 +0100, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>  
> wrote:
> |> Although I failed to close the loop before the Director's decision
> |> call for XBL 2.0, the XML Core Working Group would like to be
> |> identified as formally objecting to the resolution of the "id"
> |> attribute issue.
> |>
> |> Thank you, in advance, for any additional consideration that you can
> |> give to this issue.
> |
> | Isn't it the idea that you also provide a rationale? As in, answering
> | the question Ian raised?
>
> I thought that I had. I'll revisit the thread and try again if you
> don't believe that I did.

My bad:

   http://www.w3.org/mid/873b4y48um.fsf@nwalsh.com


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 16:12:38 UTC