- From: Mike Linksvayer <ml@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:38:27 -0800
- To: Microformats Discuss <microformats-discuss@microformats.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 13:44 +0100, Danny Ayers wrote: > XMDP profiles have already been drafted for many of the microformats > (e.g. there's one for hCalendar at [4]). Possibly stupid question: why profile_s_? (Or perhaps rather, why profile URI_s_.) Microformats are specified centrally at microformats.org, why not take advantage of that? Adding a profile attribute to <head> will be hard enough for some webmasters, why make them think about which one(s) to include? This would also comport with microformat parsers tending to be "universal", parsing all microformats. Imaginary grokMicroformats.xsl should be just another one. Finally, consider the single most informative page on the microformats wiki -- http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-classes. Not in anything like a profile-style definition list format, but it could be (probably as multiple lists). -- http://wiki.creativecommons.org/User:Mike_Linksvayer
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2007 01:38:40 UTC