Re: microformats, profiles, and taking back rel/class names [standardizedFieldValues-51]

On 7/18/07, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> wrote:
> > So in that manner, this could be non-equivalent
> >
> > <div class2="employee" profile="http://example.org/human-resources/">
> >
> > <div class2="employee" profile="http://example.org/foo/bar/">
>
> Non-equivalent, yes.
>
> > So the problem is not with @profile, but with @class.
>
> Yes.

I should add that @profile is currently only defined on head, not as a
utility attribute (which is why I used @profile2).  Other than that
though, yah.

Mark.

Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:36:06 UTC