- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:16:34 -0600
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 15:49 -0500, Harry Halpin wrote: > We can publish a new Working Draft. What's the process for that? The WG can publish a WD any time it chooses. > I would > prefer to just wait a week and go for Last Call though. Otherwise we'll > lose momentum. I lean the other way; we're already suffering from having our latest WD be more than 3 months old, and it'll only get worse if we try to squeeze "just one more thing" in. > Why not just incorporate Jeremy's suggestions, substituting "GRDDL-aware > agent" for GRDDL processor. The text to me seems informative, not > normative. He *specifically* requested that it be normative. Please let's not rush discussion of his comment. Let's have it in the WG, with the issue open. > I mean, if people are in a hurry to write a GRDDL client and > want to make unsecure GRDDL clients that's their problem, as long as > they are aware of known security issues. > > OK, I can wait 2 months - that doesn't put us too much behind schedule - > just instead of requesting to go to PR on March 31 we wait till April 9th. > >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/#sched > >>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/weekly-agenda > >>>>>>> -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 21:16:45 UTC