- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 13:13:43 +0100
- To: fantasai <fantasai@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
Hey, I think we should resolve the last few issues and go to Last Call early January. Some thoughts: * Remove "For this reason the string syntax is recommended, and the url() syntax discouraged deprecated?." as it does not really affect anything. The previous sentence already says that URIs are not resolved. * Remove the reference in the acknowledgments section as it references the wrong draft and it does not really matter. * Make the term "CSS qualified name" instead of just qualified name. * It's not entirely clear to me what terminology we're using from XML-NAMES11. Leaving a reference in to the XML specification is probably worthwhile though, although maybe we should pick XML-NAMES instead as XML-NAMES11 might be deprecated in due course. (And XML-NAMES is also more widely implemented.) I think I can do the edits to resolve these as suggested if you agree. Cheers, -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 24 December 2007 12:11:54 UTC