- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@miscoranda.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:46:35 +0000
- To: license-review@opensource.org
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
This is a formal request for review, as described in The Licence Review Process [1]. The following five sections are believed to satisfy its requirements for submissions. 1) Link to Plain Text Copy of the License http://inamidst.com/stuff/aepl/license Last-Modified: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:43:01 GMT SHA1: 81450b534c7f03bb74fbe48bead4b19839c0706b 2) Rationale for a New License There is no existing license which: * Is permissive and non-copyleft. * Contains a warranty disclaimer. * Is under five non-blank lines of text. * Applies to a single work. Application to a single work is important because existing permissive licenses only mandate preservation of the license text itself, and apply to a package of works. They are not suitable for use as a boilerplate, but also do not ensure preservation of their boilerplate. Licenses that are not under five non-blank lines of text exceed the McQuary limit, a widely appreciated æsthetic rule of thumb: http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/M/McQuary-limit.html 3) Comparison With the Most Similar OSI-Approved License This license is inspired by the Fair License: http://opensource.org/licenses/fair.php With the modification that it applies only to a single work, to meet the requirements stated in the rationale. Further inspiration, to achieve the required succinctness, came from the All-permissive Copying License: <http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/ html_node/All_002dpermissive-Copying-License.html> 4) Results of Any Legal Analysis Available None. Designed to semantically entail the two licenses above. 5) Recommended Appropriate License Proliferation Category Other/Miscellaneous licenses. Thanks, [1] http://www.opensource.org/approval -- Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2007 13:46:49 UTC