- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 11:04:43 -0700
- To: <www-archive@w3.org>
-----Original Message----- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 6:21 AM To: Jonathan Marsh Cc: Arthur Ryman; Youenn Fablet Subject: Re: WSDL Part 2 Editorial work In the end, I've also performed CR44. So we're now down to: - CR26: Isn't the existing text clear enough? - CR41: Isn't this covered already by the last paragraph of 6.5.2? - CR57: It looks to me like an xs:string already. (It's "type" which is an xs:QName.) Regarding CR44, I've added text which I feel will avoid everyone from redoing the reasonning from scratch. It at least captures my understanding of the issue. JJ. Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote: > I've now also DONE: > - CR73 (I've further split #4 in two to keep uniformity). > - CR74 (Part 1, not Part 2) > - CR23 (Part 1) > - CR42 (Part 1) > > This leaves only the following (Part 1 + Part 2) action item outstanding: > - CR44 (Part 2): Any volunteer? > > plus these three Part 2 action items which I think need no action: > - CR26: Isn't the existing text clear enough? > - CR41: Isn't this covered already by the last paragraph of 6.5.2? > - CR57: It looks to me like an xs:string already. (It's "type" which > is an xs:QName.) > > This probably puts us in good shape. :-) > > JJ. > > Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote: >> Jonathan, >> >> As you'll have probably guessed from the logs already, I've >> implemented quite a few. Here is the exact list: >> >> CR24: DONE >> CR25: DONE >> CR26: Isn't the existing text clear enough? >> CR27: DONE (this applied to subcodes, not codes, as mentionned >> erroneously in the resolution) >> CR29: DONE >> CR30: DONE >> CR31: DONE >> CR32: DONE >> CR33: DONE >> CR34: DONE (I performed an identical change to section 5. -same >> incriminating paragraph) >> CR35: DONE >> CR36: DONE >> CR40: DONE >> CR41: Isn't this covered already by the last paragraph of 6.5.2? >> CR43: DONE >> CR44: Any volunteer for this one? >> CR57: It looks to me like an xs:string already. (It's "type" which is >> an xs:QName.) >> CR67: DONE >> CR70: DONE (assuming it applied to RPCStyle-5014, not RPCStyle-5013) >> CR73: I can do this one tomorrow, failing a volunteer >> CR74: Isn't this a Part 1 issue instead? >> CR75: DONE >> CR76: DONE >> >> You probably didn't think a good night sleep would achieve that much! >> ;-) >> >> Two issues came up whilst doing the editing: >> - HTTPBinding-2600001 still used but no longer defined >> - {safety} property still in component table, should now listed as >> {safe} >> >> Arthur would know how to fix them? >> >> I cc' Athur and Youenn just in case implementations need to be fixed. >> >> JJ. >> >> Jonathan Marsh wrote: >>> >>> We have a lot of outstanding editorial work [1] pending on Part 2. >>> Are you going to be able to devote some cycles to this in the next >>> few weeks or should I try to find some help for you? (For instance, >>> me.) >>> >>> I'm thinking we will want to republish the specs when we incorporate >>> the issue resolutions we'll be working on for the next couple of weeks. >>> >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/actions_owner.html >>> >>> ** [ **Jonathan Marsh ** ][ ** jmarsh@microsoft.com >>> <mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com> ** ][ ** >>> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com** ]** >>> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2006 18:06:16 UTC