Re: New logo artwork?

On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 11:52 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> Hi,

Hi Björn,

I've just installed some revised logos. Let's see how we scored
with respect to your comments from May [1].

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2006May/0022.html

>   * they now use the old #005A9C blue instead of the "new" #083D94
>     (which would be a very bad idea, in my opinion)

We are still using the old blue. Other blues were introduced in error.

>   * they look most unprofessional, e.g. the tiny (R) in the image
>     above is just blur dust, while it was legible in the old ones

We improved the (R) I believe.

>   * the addition of SVG versions implies that popular user agents
>     like Internet Explorer will typically render replacement images
>     due to lack of SVG support in <img>

We are no longer content negotiating PNG/GIF and SVG/EPS.

>   * the updates were made only to some but not all images, e.g.
>     http://www.w3.org/Icons/WWW/w3c_home.png remains unmodified,
>     just like e.g. the Valid Foo badges

I've finished all the logos I intended to update.

>   * the SVG versions are rather unprofessional and inaccessible,
>     they won't work on mobile devices due to extensive and un-
>     justified use of CSS, they encode text as paths instead of
>     encoding them as text, and have other problems

We have made some changes to the SVG but after discussions with Chris
Lilley, Ivan Herman, and Dean Jackson, this is the structure we plan
to use for now. We plan to keep track of support for SVG so that we
can swap in an improved version in the future.

>   * there was no announcement of such a change that I know of,
>     even though I would have to update offline packages of tools
>     and documentation if it's not an accidental change

I just announced on w3c-tools as well:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-tools/2006JulSep/0003

Your input helped us, thank you.

 - Ian
-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447

Received on Friday, 14 July 2006 14:18:20 UTC