- From: WBS Mailer on behalf of <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:47:01 +0000
- To: www-archive@w3.org
Here are the answers submitted to 'SPARQL Next Steps Discussion' (the public) for Mark Baker. --------------------------------- Other Issues ---- What additional issues/missing features should factor into rechartering discussions? feature 1: forms language feature 2: feature 3: --------------------------------- Priorities ---- What issues/features are most important to you? Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): The ability to use SPARQL via forms languages such as HTML or XForms. Ideally, a forms language for RDF should be developed too. I thought there was an issue about this with the WG based on a comment of mine[1], but I guess not. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2004Jun/0007.html --------------------------------- Attend F2F ---- Will you attend the DAWG face to face at the 2006 TP? (See also, the Registration for Technical Plenary.) [ No ] --------------------------------- Demos ---- What SPARQL demos would you like to show at the meeting? Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): These answers were last modified on 15 February 2006 at 17:40:57 U.T.C. by Mark Baker Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/DAWGnextSteps/ until 2006-03-01. Regards, The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2006 17:47:06 UTC