W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > August 2006

Your blog entry: More W3C Controversy

From: Dean Jackson <dino@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 19:03:44 +1000
Message-Id: <62FC1248-196E-4B93-AE3E-B3E217C864E5@w3.org>
Cc: www-archive@w3.org, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>


Hey David,

http://dbaron.org/log/2006-08#e20060818a

I just want to say that I really appreciated your article. I agree  
completely.

Your conclusion that we have to accept "competing" specifications at  
W3C is something I share, even though I wish it were possible for the  
W3C to return to being a focused organisation.

Dean

Received on Saturday, 19 August 2006 09:04:25 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dan Brickley: "Re: Your blog entry: More W3C Controversy"
Previous message: Dan Connolly: "Mobile Web Best Practices checker: nifty!"
Next in thread: Dan Brickley: "Re: Your blog entry: More W3C Controversy"
Reply: Dan Brickley: "Re: Your blog entry: More W3C Controversy"
Reply: Karl Dubost: "Re: Your blog entry: More W3C Controversy"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:58 UTC