RE: Infowebml Feedback: odd schema document

Hi Dan,

 

Thanks for this correction! Tools like cwm are too complex for me, because
you need to install esoteric stuff like Python. And there seems not to be
another tool to check whether an OWL Full file is correct. I use the W3C RDF
Validator a lot, but that doesn't do that. I recently started using
SemanticWorks from Altova, but it swallowed the mistake without protest. Ah
well, I am too impatient I guess.

 

Regards,

Hans

_______________________ 

Hans Teijgeler

ISO 15926 specialist

www.InfowebML.ws <http://www.infowebml.ws/> 

hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl

phone +31-72-509 2005      

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Connolly [mailto:connolly@w3.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 6:31 AM
To: Dan Connolly
Cc: www-archive@w3.org; hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl; Danny Ayers
Subject: Re: Infowebml Feedback: odd schema document

 

On Nov 29, 2005, at 12:24 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:

> Wow... I just discovered this work on STEP-in-OWL.

> http://www.infowebml.ws/description/ontology-for-data-model/ontology- 

> for-data-model.htm

> 

> I tried to grab the namespace document to look at it with some tools...

>   http://www.15926.org/dm-2005-11

> 

> and I got a page with a link to an RDF document.

> http://www.15926.org/dm-2005-11/ontology-for-data-model.rdf

 

I tried to read it with cwm* and got:

 

ValueError: invalid literal for long():

 

and sure enough, I see:

 

                         <owl:Restriction>

                                 <owl:onProperty  

rdf:resource="#content"/>

                                 <owl:allValuesFrom  

rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#long"/>

                         </owl:Restriction>

 

which is almost certainly not what you meant. I expect you meant

 

                                 <owl:allValuesFrom  

rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#long"/>

 

 

* http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm.html

 

-- 

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/