Re: [Jena-devel] Re: Relative URIs in xml:base - RDF/XML parser disagreement?

Fix (the four characters uri, added to line 74 of XMLContext.java)
and test ("ARP Plus"/testDanBriXMLBase)
now in CVS.

Given that this has taken about an hour and a half of my time, those 
four characters were each quite expensive! (I guess the tests are 
actually more important)

Jeremy

Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> this is an ARP bug. I'll try and reproduce, and then fix it.
> (Hmmm, a surprise as well I thought I had coded for that case :( )
> 
> I'll also dig down the specs. It may be a corner case, but I don't 
> recall any ambiguity in XML Base Rec for this case.
> 
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> 
> Dan Brickley wrote:
> 
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> <?xml version="1.0"?>
>> <rdf:RDF xml:base="http://example.org/" 
>> xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-
>> rdf-syntax-ns#"
>>  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
>>  <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/" xml:base="test1/">
>>    <dc:title>World Wide Web Consortium</dc:title>
>>    <dc:source rdf:resource="test2/"/>
>>    <dc:relation rdf:resource=""/>
>>  </rdf:Description>
>> </rdf:RDF>
>>
>>
>> ...is a test of xml:base stacking with relative URIs.
>>
>> I tried the online Raptor service, and got:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/     http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/relation     
>> http://example.org/test1/
>> http://www.w3.org/     http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/source     
>> http://example.org/test1/test2/
>> http://www.w3.org/     http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title     World 
>> Wide Web Consortium
>>
>> I tried latest ARP download on commandline, and got:
>>
>> Warning: 
>> file:///Users/danbri/Desktop/jena/Jena-2.2/../xmlbase1.rdf[4:69]: 
>> {W107} Bad URI <test1/>: No scheme found in URI 'test1/'
>> <http://www.w3.org/> <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title> "World 
>> Wide Web Consortium" .
>> <http://www.w3.org/> <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/source> 
>> <file:///Users/danbri/Desktop/jena/test2/> .
>> <http://www.w3.org/> <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/relation> 
>> <file:///Users/danbri/Desktop/jena/Jena-2.2/../xmlbase1.rdf> .
>>
>> The test case is basically an RDFization of the example in 
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/#syntax
>> (tried out of curiosity after a thread on the atom-syntax list).
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Syntax-ID-xml-base 
>> doesn't seem to
>> require absolute URIs in RDF's treatment of xml:base, nor rule out the 
>> stacking behaviour.
>>
>> So from a quick look I'd guess that ARP is in error, rather than 
>> Raptor. This is a somewhat
>> obscure corner-case so I expect other parsers might also vary in 
>> behaviour...
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> ps. the dc:relation thing is in there because
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JanMar/0234.html 
>> via
>> http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xml-base tells me that 
>> "" self-refs aren't
>> affected by xml:base. Not sure if that decision got reverted.
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-testcases-20040210/ has a good set 
>> of xmlbase tests
>> but it doesn't seem to exercise this possibility (of multiple 
>> xml:base, some relative).
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> <?xml version="1.0"?>
>> <rdf:RDF xml:base="http://example.org/" 
>> xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
>>   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
>>   <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/" xml:base="test1/">
>>     <dc:title>World Wide Web Consortium</dc:title>     <dc:source 
>> rdf:resource="test2/"/>
>>     <dc:relation rdf:resource=""/>
>>   </rdf:Description>
>> </rdf:RDF>
>>   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Jena-devel mailing list
> Jena-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jena-devel

Received on Monday, 25 July 2005 11:01:18 UTC