- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 11:42:31 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org, whatwg@whatwg.org
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > > I'd go through the attributes in the draft and decide for each whether > it makes sense to allow animation of it. If animation of the input name > attribute does not change the name of the control then it probably does > not make sense to allow animation of it, for example. MSIE allows e.g. > animation of the input size and textarea cols/rows attributes and does > not allow animation of the input type and input value attributes (i.e., > doing that has no observable effect). Given that there are no non-deprecated presentation attributes in WF2, it would seem that it does not make sense to animate any of the values in the draft. I have updated the draft to this effect. (Section 8.) >> Does SMIL define how animation interacts with these DOM Core features? > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-SMIL2-20050107/animation.html#animationNS-AnimationSandwichModel That seems to agree that only presentational features should be animated. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2005 11:42:41 UTC