- From: Mikel Maron <mikel_maron@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 02:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Raj Singh <raj@rajsingh.org>, "Josh@oklieb" <josh@oklieb.net>, libby@asemantics.com, danbri@w3.org
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
<geo:geography> sounds like an possible bridge between RSS/RDF and GML. Chatted with Dan Brickley, who shepherds(?) the w3c geo vocabulary. He is interested in profiling GML for use within RSS/RDF [http://danbri.org/words/2005/07/26/110] and supports working on a proposal. I've cc:d Dan and Libby Miller (as well as the w3 archiver in a first step to more formal discussions there) -Mikel --- Raj Singh <raj@rajsingh.org> wrote: > You're right. I guess that's a good proposal. Another idea is to have > > atom make this part of their model, simply to try to encourage use by > > atom implementers. > > On Aug 18, 2005, at 1:39 PM, Josh@oklieb wrote: > > > Also, I don't think there is now a <geography> element in gml, so > > it needs to be another namespace (and what is wrong with georss: or > > > proposing it as an addition to geo: ?) > > > >
Received on Friday, 19 August 2005 10:06:01 UTC