W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > October 2004

Re: WebArch draft, 14 Oct 2004

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:49:43 -0500
To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Cc: www-archive@w3.org
Message-Id: <1097794182.30433.155.camel@dirk>
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 16:05, Norman Walsh wrote:
> The webarch draft at
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/webarch-20041014/
> reflects my best effort to incorporate all of the decisions reached at
> the Basel f2f meeting along with editorial suggestions proposed by
> several readers. I made another end-to-end editorial pass as well.
> I am not aware of any outstanding decisions not reflected in this
> draft, (which doesn't mean there aren't any :-)

In 1.1 I still see

"... in accordance with RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. However ..."

Did you change your mind, or forget?

"After discussion, it seemed that the use of these keywords in webarch
is as appropriate as the use in RFC2119 itself. Concerns about
"conformance" turned out to be misplaced; the constraints in RFC2119
regard interoperability, and as such, the editor was advised to change
the "however" in "in accordance with RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. However, ..."."
  -- http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/10/05-07-tag.html#webarch-dc

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Thursday, 14 October 2004 22:48:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:34 UTC