bNodes for named graphs

• From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
• Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:06:21 +0100
• To: "Chris Bizer" <chris@bizer.de>, <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
• Cc: <www-archive@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <8D5B24B83C6A2E4B9E7EE5FA82627DC93969B4@sdcexcea01.emea.cpqcorp.net>

Chris, Patrick, Pat, Jeremy,

One of the discussions running in DAWG at the moment is about being able
to query over aggregations of graphs.  One aspect of this is having
bNodes for the containers of triples (subgraphs).

I noticed that in the Named Graphs document bNodes are not allowed in
naming a graph.  I wondered why - what are the technical reasons for
this?  

	Andy

Received on Tuesday, 5 October 2004 11:06:54 UTC