- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:37:47 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262166 On Sat, 2 Oct 2004, Jim Ley wrote: > > > Sure, there was lots of mention of intranet- based content using them, > > but intranets aren't very high on the list of concerns here > > Are you saying that intranet support is not a primary goal of the > Mozilla project, that it only cares about public websites? Or was it > purely on this particular issue that was relevant? Neither. I was refering to the fact that intranet content does not drive feature development in main-line Mozilla products. See, e.g.: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=4096B118.3050903%40meer.net Brendan's points in that e-mail apply equally well to your patch as they did to XForms and MNG when he wrote it. >>> Am I to assume that an implementation without this problems would be >>> perfectly acceptable to Mozilla QA? >> >> There's no such entity as "Mozilla QA". > > How is Quality Assurance conducted within in Mozilla? By anyone who files a bug. > As I understood http://www.mozilla.org/quality/ to be Mozilla QA. That is a Web page. Web pages do not have opinions on whether things are acceptable or not. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 2 October 2004 16:37:50 UTC