Re: [w3photo] short note

hmm, can't check AKTivePhoto atm (my provider seems to have
routing problems), but the rdf at w3photo.org looks ok.
I only changed the namespace uri at [1] (spec and doc), which
had a "03" instead of "02". Does AKTive Photo already use the
"03" one (internally)? does this cause problems?

best,
benjamin

--
Benjamin Nowack

Kruppstr. 100
45145 Essen, Germany


[1] http://www.bnowack.de/w3photo/pages/image_vocabs

On 20.05.2004 22:42:08, Hugh Glaser wrote:
>Not sure where the data is wrong, but the month is wrong in AKTive Photo,
>and that means the day goes wrong as well.
>Cheers.
>-- 
>Hugh Glaser, Declarative Systems & Software Engineering
>              School of Electronics and Computer Science,
>              University of Southampton,
>              Southampton SO17 1BJ
>Work: +44 (0)23 8059 3670, Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 3045
>Mobile: +44 (0)77 0355 0122, Home: +44 (0)23 8061 5652
>http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~hg/

=================
This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History
Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net.

Subscribe Instructions
To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: subscribe

Unsubscribe Instructions
To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: unsubscribe

Help
To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: help

Received on Friday, 21 May 2004 04:11:29 UTC