W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > March 2004

Re: namespace URI

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:54:58 +0300
Message-Id: <16B123FD-82F1-11D8-9969-000A95EAFCEA@nokia.com>
Cc: www-archive@w3.org, ext Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
To: "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>


On Mar 31, 2004, at 11:49, ext Jeremy Carroll wrote:

> If I've understood you want:
>   to use / instead of # as the namespace separator
>   doing a get on any of the terms will get a representation of that 
> term

Right.

E.g. http://sw.nokia.com/FN-1/published

>   we will collect each schema in a file with an unrelated URL

Correct.

>
> that seems OK to me. (Who knows what best practice is? :) )
>
> We could also have a trix file with both the rdfg and swp schemas in 
> it, named by the URIs at which you can get the individual schemas.

That would be an interesting proof-of-concept. Except that at
the moment, our server can't eat TriX (it can only spit it out ;-)

>
> On the dc:rights
> My copyright is held by "Hewlett-Packard Development Company, LP", put 
> that last ... (as far as I understand any intellectual property I 
> generate belongs to them)

I had expected as much, as I was also thinking I would probably
have to put Nokia.

I expect Pat would similarly need to specify IHMC.

Patrick


>
>
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
> Patrick Stickler wrote:
>> On Mar 31, 2004, at 09:59, ext Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>>>
>>> We need to finalize a namespace URI for this round of publications.
>>>
>>> I suggest we go with something on Patrick's TriX site since he does 
>>> a good job of keeping it up to date.
>>>
>>> So suggest patrick gets to choose a URI directory and the following 
>>> files therein:
>> The following suggestions follow our vocabulary versioning 
>> methodology, which
>> keeps disjunct the identity of vocabularies from their 
>> representations (i.e.
>> RDF/XML documents, etc.).
>> Major versions are indicated in the namespace name. Minor versions 
>> are reflected
>> in the RDF/XML document names (see below).
>> So for each of the following, I propose both a namespace, and an 
>> initial home
>> for the RDF/XML document:
>>>
>>> - a trix namespace, with DTD and XML Schema
>> xmlns:trix="http://sw.nokia.com/TriX-1/"
>> URL: http://sw.nokia.com/trix/schemas/TriX-1.0.rdf
>>> - an rdfg namespace with RDFS/OWL Schema
>> xmlns:rdfg="http://sw.nokia.com/RDFG-1/"
>> URL: http://sw.nokia.com/trix/schemas/RDFG-1.0.rdf
>>> - an swp namespace with RDFS/OWL Schema
>> xmlns:swp="http://sw.nokia.com/SWP-1/"
>> URL: http://sw.nokia.com/trix/schemas/SWP-1.0.rdf
>> I'll then add the necessary links to the TriX homepage I've
>> been maintaining at http://sw.nokia.com/trix/.
>> And these vocabularies will be syndicated into the Nokia SW Server
>> such that one can access both human browsable and machine readable
>> (RDF) representations of the terms. I.e. simply doing a GET on
>> http://sw.nokia.com/RDFG-1/Graph will provide a description of
>> that class, etc.
>> Whether we want to employ the VOC vocabulary for vocabulary
>> descriptions [1] is an open question. If so, I'm happy creating
>> the RDF/XML documents accordingly. See [2] for an example.
>> Anyway, are the namespaces/URLs above OK with you guys?
>> Would the following dc:rights statement be adequate/acceptable:
>> [
>> Copyright (C) 2004 {AUTHORS' NAMES ORDERED AS ON PAPER}. All rights 
>> reserved.
>> This document may be copied, published, and distributed, without 
>> restriction
>> of any kind, provided it is not modified in any way.
>> THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF 
>> ANY KIND,
>> EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, 
>> WARRANTIES THAT
>> THE DOCUMENT IS FREE OF DEFECTS, MERCHANTABLE, FIT FOR A PARTICULAR 
>> PURPOSE
>> OR NON-INFRINGING. THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY AND USABILITY OF 
>> THIS
>> DOCUMENT IS WITH YOU. SHOULD THIS DOCUMENT PROVE DEFECTIVE IN ANY 
>> RESPECT,
>> YOU (NOT NOKIA, ITS LICENSORS OR AFFILIATES OR ANY OTHER CONTRIBUTOR) 
>> ASSUME
>> THE COST OF ANY NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION.
>> ]
>> (the Nokia legal trolls like that last bit to be in there, not that 
>> it isn't
>> usually obvious to anyone with half a clue...)
>> Patrick
>> [1] http://sw.nokia.com/VOC-1
>> [2] http://sw.nokia.com/schemas/nokia/FN-1.0.rdf
>> -- 
>> Patrick Stickler
>> Nokia, Finland
>> patrick.stickler@nokia.com
>
>

--

Patrick Stickler
Nokia, Finland
patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2004 04:03:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:25 UTC