- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:54:58 +0300
- To: "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org, ext Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
On Mar 31, 2004, at 11:49, ext Jeremy Carroll wrote: > If I've understood you want: > to use / instead of # as the namespace separator > doing a get on any of the terms will get a representation of that > term Right. E.g. http://sw.nokia.com/FN-1/published > we will collect each schema in a file with an unrelated URL Correct. > > that seems OK to me. (Who knows what best practice is? :) ) > > We could also have a trix file with both the rdfg and swp schemas in > it, named by the URIs at which you can get the individual schemas. That would be an interesting proof-of-concept. Except that at the moment, our server can't eat TriX (it can only spit it out ;-) > > On the dc:rights > My copyright is held by "Hewlett-Packard Development Company, LP", put > that last ... (as far as I understand any intellectual property I > generate belongs to them) I had expected as much, as I was also thinking I would probably have to put Nokia. I expect Pat would similarly need to specify IHMC. Patrick > > > > Jeremy > > > > Patrick Stickler wrote: >> On Mar 31, 2004, at 09:59, ext Jeremy Carroll wrote: >>> >>> We need to finalize a namespace URI for this round of publications. >>> >>> I suggest we go with something on Patrick's TriX site since he does >>> a good job of keeping it up to date. >>> >>> So suggest patrick gets to choose a URI directory and the following >>> files therein: >> The following suggestions follow our vocabulary versioning >> methodology, which >> keeps disjunct the identity of vocabularies from their >> representations (i.e. >> RDF/XML documents, etc.). >> Major versions are indicated in the namespace name. Minor versions >> are reflected >> in the RDF/XML document names (see below). >> So for each of the following, I propose both a namespace, and an >> initial home >> for the RDF/XML document: >>> >>> - a trix namespace, with DTD and XML Schema >> xmlns:trix="http://sw.nokia.com/TriX-1/" >> URL: http://sw.nokia.com/trix/schemas/TriX-1.0.rdf >>> - an rdfg namespace with RDFS/OWL Schema >> xmlns:rdfg="http://sw.nokia.com/RDFG-1/" >> URL: http://sw.nokia.com/trix/schemas/RDFG-1.0.rdf >>> - an swp namespace with RDFS/OWL Schema >> xmlns:swp="http://sw.nokia.com/SWP-1/" >> URL: http://sw.nokia.com/trix/schemas/SWP-1.0.rdf >> I'll then add the necessary links to the TriX homepage I've >> been maintaining at http://sw.nokia.com/trix/. >> And these vocabularies will be syndicated into the Nokia SW Server >> such that one can access both human browsable and machine readable >> (RDF) representations of the terms. I.e. simply doing a GET on >> http://sw.nokia.com/RDFG-1/Graph will provide a description of >> that class, etc. >> Whether we want to employ the VOC vocabulary for vocabulary >> descriptions [1] is an open question. If so, I'm happy creating >> the RDF/XML documents accordingly. See [2] for an example. >> Anyway, are the namespaces/URLs above OK with you guys? >> Would the following dc:rights statement be adequate/acceptable: >> [ >> Copyright (C) 2004 {AUTHORS' NAMES ORDERED AS ON PAPER}. All rights >> reserved. >> This document may be copied, published, and distributed, without >> restriction >> of any kind, provided it is not modified in any way. >> THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF >> ANY KIND, >> EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, >> WARRANTIES THAT >> THE DOCUMENT IS FREE OF DEFECTS, MERCHANTABLE, FIT FOR A PARTICULAR >> PURPOSE >> OR NON-INFRINGING. THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY AND USABILITY OF >> THIS >> DOCUMENT IS WITH YOU. SHOULD THIS DOCUMENT PROVE DEFECTIVE IN ANY >> RESPECT, >> YOU (NOT NOKIA, ITS LICENSORS OR AFFILIATES OR ANY OTHER CONTRIBUTOR) >> ASSUME >> THE COST OF ANY NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION. >> ] >> (the Nokia legal trolls like that last bit to be in there, not that >> it isn't >> usually obvious to anyone with half a clue...) >> Patrick >> [1] http://sw.nokia.com/VOC-1 >> [2] http://sw.nokia.com/schemas/nokia/FN-1.0.rdf >> -- >> Patrick Stickler >> Nokia, Finland >> patrick.stickler@nokia.com > > -- Patrick Stickler Nokia, Finland patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2004 04:03:08 UTC