On Mar 16, 2004, at 13:34, ext Chris Bizer wrote: > > > Thus I would also mandate two different namespaces: rdfg: for general > terms > like Graph, subGraphOf, equivialentGraph ... and swp: (short for: > Semantic > Web Publishing) for our agent scenario specific vocabulary. > I.e. rdfg:Graph a rdfs:Class ; rdfs:comment "An RDF graph (with intensional semantics)." . rdfg:equivalentGraph a rdf:Property ; rdfs:comment "The subject and object graphs are equivalent as defined by RDF Concepts." ; rdfs:domain rdfg:Graph ; rdfs:range rdfg:Graph . rdfg:subGraphOf a rdf:Property ; rdfs:comment "The subject graph is equivalent to a subset of the object graph." ; rdfs:domain rdfg:Graph ; rdfs:range rdfg:Graph ; And swp:Authority a rdfs:Class ; rdfs:comment "An authority, or origin, of a graph; such as a person or company." . swp:Signature a rdfs:Class ; rdfs:comment "A signature used to authenticate a graph." . swp:authority a rdf:Property ; rdfs:comment "The object is the authority, or origin, of the subject graph." ; rdfs:domain rdfg:Graph ; rdfs:range swp:Authority . swp:assertedBy a rdf:Property ; rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfg:authority ; rdfs:comment "The object is the asserting authority of the subject graph." ; rdfs:domain rdfg:Graph ; rdfs:range swp:Authority . swp:signature a rdf:Property ; rdfs:comment "The object is the signature to be used to authenticate the subject graph." ; rdfs:domain rdfg:Graph ; rdfs:range swp:Signature . Seems reasonable to me. It also further narrows the focus of the bootstrapping/grounding/terminal interpretation to an even more minimal vocabulary. Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Nokia, Finland patrick.stickler@nokia.comReceived on Tuesday, 16 March 2004 09:17:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:25 UTC