- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:58:10 +0200
- To: "ext Chris Bizer" <chris@bizer.de>
- Cc: <phayes@ihmc.us>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, <www-archive@w3.org>
On Mar 16, 2004, at 13:34, ext Chris Bizer wrote:
>
>
> Thus I would also mandate two different namespaces: rdfg: for general
> terms
> like Graph, subGraphOf, equivialentGraph ... and swp: (short for:
> Semantic
> Web Publishing) for our agent scenario specific vocabulary.
>
I.e.
rdfg:Graph
a rdfs:Class ;
rdfs:comment "An RDF graph (with intensional semantics)." .
rdfg:equivalentGraph
a rdf:Property ;
rdfs:comment "The subject and object graphs are equivalent as
defined by RDF Concepts." ;
rdfs:domain rdfg:Graph ;
rdfs:range rdfg:Graph .
rdfg:subGraphOf
a rdf:Property ;
rdfs:comment "The subject graph is equivalent to a subset of the
object graph." ;
rdfs:domain rdfg:Graph ;
rdfs:range rdfg:Graph ;
And
swp:Authority
a rdfs:Class ;
rdfs:comment "An authority, or origin, of a graph; such as a
person or company." .
swp:Signature
a rdfs:Class ;
rdfs:comment "A signature used to authenticate a graph." .
swp:authority
a rdf:Property ;
rdfs:comment "The object is the authority, or origin, of the
subject graph." ;
rdfs:domain rdfg:Graph ;
rdfs:range swp:Authority .
swp:assertedBy
a rdf:Property ;
rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfg:authority ;
rdfs:comment "The object is the asserting authority of the
subject graph." ;
rdfs:domain rdfg:Graph ;
rdfs:range swp:Authority .
swp:signature
a rdf:Property ;
rdfs:comment "The object is the signature to be used to
authenticate the subject graph." ;
rdfs:domain rdfg:Graph ;
rdfs:range swp:Signature .
Seems reasonable to me.
It also further narrows the focus of the
bootstrapping/grounding/terminal
interpretation to an even more minimal vocabulary.
Patrick
--
Patrick Stickler
Nokia, Finland
patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2004 09:17:42 UTC