On Mar 15, 2004, at 14:41, ext Jeremy Carroll wrote: >> Oops. Missed this. I had always been thinking 'intensionally'... ;-) >> >> Patrick > > I am not so sure you have - You may be right ;-) > I think I'll make two stabs at the text, one > intensional, the other extensional and we can ponder - and then junk > both of > them! Sounds like a plan... Patrick > > Jeremy > > > -- Patrick Stickler Nokia, Finland patrick.stickler@nokia.comReceived on Monday, 15 March 2004 07:55:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:25 UTC