Re: Graphs: intension and extension

On Mar 15, 2004, at 14:41, ext Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>> Oops. Missed this. I had always been thinking 'intensionally'...  ;-)
>>
>> Patrick
>
> I am not so sure you have -

You may be right ;-)


> I think I'll make two stabs at the text, one
> intensional, the other extensional and we can ponder - and then junk 
> both of
> them!

Sounds like a plan...

Patrick


>
> Jeremy
>
>
>

--

Patrick Stickler
Nokia, Finland
patrick.stickler@nokia.com

Received on Monday, 15 March 2004 07:55:48 UTC