W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > March 2004

Re: Named graphs etc

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:02:04 +0200
Message-Id: <6F2881CE-71A8-11D8-B899-000A95EAFCEA@nokia.com>
Cc: "Chris Bizer" <chris@bizer.de>, <www-archive@w3.org>, <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: "ext Pat Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>

On Mar 09, 2004, at 07:11, ext Pat Hayes wrote:
>> 1. Graphs published on the Semantic Web are not asserted
> Well, the trouble is that most folk think that they are being 
> asserted, at present. So we have to preserve this understanding of 
> current normal usage.

True. It's probably most practical to allow folks to presume that unless
explicitly stated that a graph is or isn't asserted, that it is 

My recent proposal for a bootstrapping intra-graph vocabulary reflects 
the opposite
presumption, that unless explicitly marked as asserted, it's not, but 
easily fixed.



Patrick Stickler
Nokia, Finland
Received on Tuesday, 9 March 2004 04:02:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:25 UTC