Re: RDF encoding test case

Tim, thread starts with
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jan/0128.html

On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 11:56, Norman Walsh wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> Here's the test case.
-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jan/att-0128/test.rdf

Ah... this is an IRI-related bug.
Looking at the cwm code, it seem to be all over the
map re IRIs:

wierd... from sax2rdf.py: uri = (ns + ln).encode('utf-8')

the question is what sink.newSymbol() takes...
bummer; RDFSink.py doesn't say what newSymbol() takes.

________________________________________________________________________
hmm... notation3.py takes the output from uripath.join()
and gives it to newSymbol... maybe that's a clue...

no, uripath is silent on IRIs.

Tim? Did you say N3 is I18N-happy? In working that
out, did you decide whether newSymbol() takes IRIs
or URIs?

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Monday, 26 January 2004 18:23:31 UTC