On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Gervase Markham wrote: > > - 2.1. expdate. Is there a less application-specific name for this type > that could be used? Maybe, do you have a suggestion? > - Do the new types mean that extensions to RFC3106 might be useful? Is > it the job of your spec to specify them? Maybe, and not in this version, respectively. > - "The entire model can be emulated purely using JavaScript and the DOM. > With such a library, this model could be used and down-level clients > could be supported before user agents implemented it ubiquitously. > Creating such a library is left as an exercise to the reader." > > This begs the question: why not write and publish the library instead of > writing a spec? Native implementations are more solid, and don't require scripting. -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL U+1047E /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Monday, 5 January 2004 19:27:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:21 UTC