- From: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:26:34 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu>, www-archive@w3.org, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, "C.M.Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@acm.org>
On Dec 14, 2004, at 1:06 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: > On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 12:54 -0500, Eric Miller wrote: >> On Dec 13, 2004, at 10:33 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 10:16 +0100, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: >>>> Le sam 11/12/2004 à 00:43, Dan Connolly a écrit : >>>>> Say... actually, it doesn't work so well in the online service... >>>>> >>>>> "XML Parsing Error: syntax error" >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2000/06/webdata/xslt? >>>>> xslfile=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org% >>>>> 2F2004%2F01%2Frdxh%2Fgrddl-xml- >>>>> processor&xmlfile=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org >>>>> %2F2003%2Fg%2Fpo-doc >>>>> >>>>> I can't find the problem, Dom; help? >>>> >>>> Fixed; there was some obscure combination of bugs in the style sheet >>>> and >>>> bug in the XSLT processor; >>>> http://www.w3.org/2000/06/webdata/xslt? >>>> xslfile=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2004%2F01%2Frdxh%2Fgrddl-xml- >>>> processor&xmlfile=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2003%2Fg%2Fpo-doc.xml >>>> has >>>> not the right content. Woohoo! >>> >>> Yes... much better now. Thanks! >> >> excellent! you guys rock! :) > > Thanks. > > Hmm... prolly time to take this thread to the > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org list soon. I'm ok with this. >> Dom, I was thinking of adding this example to the GRDDL service [1] >> because I think this is an example that many in the XML world will be >> interested in. Before I do, however, I wanted to know if you're OK >> with this addition (you own the sig at the bottom of the page) and how >> you / DanC feel about an example the specifics of which are not yet >> reflected in the GRDDL note [2]. > > Go for it. (I'm pretty sure Dom feels the same way). Done. Feel free to wordsmith to taste... $Id: grddl-xml-demo.html,v 1.9 2004/12/14 18:19:13 em Exp $ > I think the current GRDDL note actually covers this as it is, > but perhaps it's sufficiently subtle that it's worth pointing > out how the thing works recursively. The recursive aspects are a bit subtle, but I think incredibly powerful and as such worth making more explicit. Additionally the Annotation bit associated with XML schema (from my perspective) also warrants its own section. I'm still sort of on the fence about following xsi:schemaLocation, with a slight preference to include this capability. But if you guys think not, at least @@'ing this issue in an updated GRDDL note is probably worthwhile. > The GRDDL how-to currently doesn't mention the use of GRDDL > except for XHTML pages. hmm. Which 'how-to'? In the 'Status of the Document' section of the CG Note both the XHTML and XML [1] demos are referenced. Thats the path I've been taking to get to these services. [1] http://www.w3.org/2003/11/rdf-in-xhtml-demo [2] http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/grddl-xml-demo -- eric miller http://www.w3.org/people/em/ semantic web activity lead http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ w3c world wide web consortium http://www.w3.org/ > >> This example is of interest to me >> enough that I'd be willing to help with an updated version to the >> GRDDL >> note. :) >> >> (cc'ing MSM 'cause he and I have been working on similar XML Schema >> Annotation work. MSM, the thread starts here [3]) >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/grddl-xml-demo >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-grddl-20040413/ >> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Dec/0014.html > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E > >
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2004 18:26:36 UTC