- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:07:27 -0500
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 21:22, Mark Baker wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 08:41:36PM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > > > Sorry, I intended it to be implicit in my message that I'd like to raise > > > an issue. My apologies for not making that clear. > > > > A new web architecture issue? I still don't see one. > > EPRs are structured identifiers, yet not URIs. You don't see a problem > with that? perhaps, but not something new to the TAG. We've said our piece on this... http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#pr-use-uris > There's a bunch of other issues too, I was just focusing on what I felt > to be the most obvious one. Consider wsa:To and how it supercedes the > HTTP Request-URI, or wsa:Action and how it supercedes the HTTP request > method... > > > > Thanks, I'll keep that in mind. But I think I'm working within the > > > bounds of documented process to request that the TAG consider > > > architectural issues with member submissions. Am I mistaken? > > > > Yes. The TAG has no responsibility for submissions, as far as I know. > > *shrug* Well, the TAG hears appeals of rejected submissions. oh... hmm... well, in theory, at least. > Mark. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2004 03:07:28 UTC