- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 09:23:24 -0400 (EDT)
- To: sandro@w3.org
- Cc: connolly@w3.org, www-archive@w3.org
From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> Subject: Re: Report on Parsing the OWL tests Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 08:24:13 -0400 > > Looks good. > > > > The result table doesn't seem to indicate that OWLP parses the files for > > entailment tests. Could that be indicated somehow? > > Did you scroll down to the end of the table? Of course not! That would be too much work! (Actually I did, but I did't make the connection.) > I had originally sorted them next the related test... The table needs > better organization, maybe different tables for different kinds of > tests, and sort options, and options of showing only approved tests. > Any ideas? Yes. Use a four-dimensional table. :-) Actually that is probably not a bad idea, you could have Test Syntax Entailment Euler ... ... Euler ... ... Partial views of this information would almost certainly be needed. > -- sandro peter
Received on Friday, 5 September 2003 09:23:39 UTC