- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:31:38 -0500
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org, Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 09:19, Brian McBride wrote: > We have a request to add a new test case: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20031010-comments/#entailment-from-inconsistent-graph Er... this looks like the start of a separate issues list again. Please just track comments; i.e. make sure the mail gets answered. I recommend against sorting by document and I *strongly* recommend agains making up new names. In WebOnt, we relied on the comment archive as the authoritative source, and built an automated index that allowed us to see which threads weren't closed: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/lc-status-report.html I can't really recommend the automation technique without reservation; it took about 45 minutes to regenerate by the end. So manual tracking might be easier. But try not to shift the focus from the issues list and the comments archive when you're tracking. > essentially a gigo test case. > > Do the test case editors propose to add this test case? How many > implementations will pass it? If not enough, what do was say at request > to advance to PR? > > Brian -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2003 10:35:33 UTC