- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 17:42:14 -0400
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, www-archive@w3.org
- Message-Id: <p05200f10bb17d9e1ff5f@[10.0.1.2]>
Brian- OWL is handling our LC comments differently than RDF did, not breaking up messages into smaller pieces and parcelling these out -- makes our issue tracking easier for us (i.e. see [1] - Dan's automated issue tracker using RDF) However, while this has made it easier for us, it doesn't always make it easier for the people expecting comments to track what we've answered - so I took an action to email this to you (and you are welcome to forward in public as needed) to make sure we don't miss any of the LC comments from RDF Core. 1 - We believe that the email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jun/0011.html responds to all but two of the issues raised in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0004.html The two not addressed are #owlref-rdfcore-owl-rdf-semantics and #owlref-rdfcore-class-ontology We will get you comments on these soon, but would appreciate your letting us know if the rest are addressed to the group's satisfaction. 2 - We believe that the email http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0052.html is answered in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jun/0027.html please let us know if this answer is satisfactory 3 - We believe that the email http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0053.html (and its related thread) is answered in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jun/0037.html please let us know if this answer is satisfactory 4 - We believe that the email http://www.w3.org/mid/Pine.GSO.4.44.0305091706010.13980-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk was answered in two parts: http://www.w3.org/mid/20030530.142215.40541163.pfps@research.bell-labs.com and http://www.w3.org/mid/20030530.142215.40541163.pfps@research.bell-labs.com Please let us know if this answer is satisfactory ----- Summarizing - we think we've answered all but two of your comments: (owl-ref-rdfcore-owl-rdf-semantics and owlref-rdfcore-class-ontology) and look forward to hearing as to whether these answers appropriately address the issues raised. Thanks much Jim H. [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/lc-status-report.html -- Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 *** 240-277-3388 (Cell) http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler *** NOTE CHANGED CELL NUMBER ***
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2003 17:42:26 UTC