- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 11:06:05 -0400
- To: <webwatch@yahoogroups.com>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
At 05:49 PM 2003-07-10, Kelly Ford wrote: >I'm curious if anyone has an example of the sort of graph that Google is >using but that might be more accessible. I'd like to point it out to the >folks at Google as perhaps a model. The best quote shining unquote example that I recall is what Corda did for the National Cancer Institute. NCI statistical graphics on the web http://cancer.gov/atlasplus/ However, all the other information shared as part of the Federal Statistics caucus workshop on accessible tables (and charts) is of interest to anyone working in this area. FedStats workshop http://workshops.fedstats.gov/FS508Workshop.htm >they indicated that they didn't make specific numbers available While it would be nice to believe that "information wants to be free" and that it will all be free, this is an area where I expect there will need to be some class-action negotiation among interest groups and some new business rules invented and proliferated. In particular, in future, data aggregators like Google will make the numbers available for a fee to businesses via Web Service interfaces. The architecture that I have been pushing for involves direct communication between the consumer's user agent, say a PacMate device, and the machine-oriented web service version of publishing this information. The key is to get reasonable access terms for people with bonafide need to do their own rendering of the data, with other means of ensuring that they aren't just scraping it from Google and re-selling it in competition with Google. There may be a Bookshare-like qualification test involved; that access to certain business practices (technically, service-delivery chains) is offered as an accomodation and only to those who actually need the accomodation. The word on the street is to watch developments in digital-identity handling with the new buzzword of 'federation.' That is to say the Google search phrase to use to find information on this trend is "identity federation". This is the great white hope of the moment in terms of delivering security and privacy in unprecedented combinations. So individuals with bona-fide needs can get matching accomodations without trumpeting sensitive information to the world. It takes a lot of thought to relate the following references to this topic, but I'm going to repeat them anyway, as this is an important topic. UD/DA considerations for The Grid http://trace.wisc.edu/docs/ud4grid/ some WAI comments on Device Independence http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2001Nov/0069.html V2 -Information Technology Access Interfaces http://www.incits.org/tc_home/v2.htm the research of Sangmi Lee in the Community Grids Lab, University of Indiana http://www.google.com/search?q=sangmi+universal identity federation as a trend in online security http://www.google.com/search?q=identity+federation Al >All, > >If you navigate to http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.html you'll find >a series of fun/interesting facts about Google queries. However there are >some graphs for things like web browsers used and languages. At present >these only have alt text telling you that a graph is indeed present. > >I wrote to Google asking for more descriptive text and they indicated that >they didn't make specific numbers available. So I'm curious if anyone has >an example of the sort of graph that Google is using but that might be >more accessible. I'd like to point it out to the folks at Google as >perhaps a model. > >Thanks, > >Kelly > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> >KnowledgeStorm has over 22,000 B2B technology solutions. The most >comprehensive IT buyers' information available. Research, compare, decide. >E-Commerce | Application Dev | Accounting-Finance | Healthcare | Project >Mgt | Sales-Marketing | More >http://us.click.yahoo.com/IMai8D/UYQGAA/cIoLAA/nGfwlB/TM >---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> > >To Post a message, send it to: webwatch@eGroups.com >To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: webwatch-unsubscribe@eGroups.com > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Friday, 11 July 2003 13:06:16 UTC