- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 12:17:05 -0500
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>
- Cc: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, www-archive@w3.org
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 10:43:07PM -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > To go back to the car example, if I define a URI scheme "vin" that > matches the manufacturer's vehicle identification number standard > and then deploy a resolution mechanism for "vin" using the WWW > interface, the GET vin:289814678... will consistently result in > representations of cars that are always in the form of conceptual > works, because that is what the WWW interface provides in response to > GET on any URI. Yet it would be completely unreasonable for the > Semantic Web to claim that "vin" URIs identify the conceptual work > and not the car, right? Are you two in synch about what a "conceptual work" is here? I'm not so sure. From the above, it appears that Roy believe it's the bag-o-bits representation about the car, while I think that Tim defines it to be something like "an information object about the car". As I said in my previous message, I believe those two models to be equivalent, though it also suggests to me that the "conceptual work" model is unnecessarily confusing, which can itself cause problems. For example, Tim writes; "If a web page is about a car, then the URI can't be used to refer to the web page." -- http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/HTTP-URI.html#L728 Which I believe to be incorrect, because (assuming that "web page" is the conceptual work, and not the bag-o-bits .. oh, the agony of nomenclature) there is only one thing; the conceptual work *is* the car. MB -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis
Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2003 12:16:31 UTC